Meet In CommonNews

Local

EXCLUSIVE: GOP Makes Push To Boost Trump Accounts For Military Children

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: The Daily Caller

Rebeka Zeljko National Correspondent November 12, 2026 11:58 AM ET November 12, 2026 11:58 AM ET Rebeka Zeljko National Correspondent Font Size: Republican Texas Rep. August Pfluger introduced legislation that would boost Trump Account funds for children whose parents are actively in the military.Pfluger revealed the Trump Accounts for Military Children Act on Thursday, which would authorize the Secretary of War to pay a bonus of up to $2,500 into the Trump Accounts for qualifying children, according to bill text obtained exclusively by the Daily Caller. President Donald Trump established the investment accounts in July, providing a $1,000 seed contribution. (RELATED: Elon Musk Wants Every Kid To Have a Piece Of His Trillion-Dollar Empire)“Having served in the Air Force for more than twenty-five years, I know firsthand that our military families sacrifice every day so the rest of us can live in freedom,” Pfluger told the Caller.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at The Daily Caller

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Reliable software matters more than releasing new features quickly.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

You inherit a fortune made in ways you despise. Can you keep it?

You inherit a substantial sum from a relative who accumulated it through practices you consider exploitative. Keeping it would improve your family's security; donating it could support people harmed by similar practices.

Can ownership be morally clean when its history is not?

Explore this quandary