Meet In CommonNews

Local

Extended legal protections for Afghans sought in US House discharge petition

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Iowa Capital Dispatch

WASHINGTON — Colorado Democratic Rep. Jason Crow, a military veteran, is making an attempt during Congress’ lame-duck session to provide legal protections for Afghanistan immigrants who aided the U.S. military for years, but now face swift deportations. Earlier this week, Crow filed a discharge petition. If he gains 218 signatures, he can force a House vote on his measure, H.R. 9899, which would allow certain Afghan nationals to qualify for Temporary Protected Status until July 2029. So far, the discharge petition has 114 backers, with two Republicans, Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania and Don Bacon of Nebraska, on board. There are 218 Republicans, 214 Democrats and one independent in the House. “After more than two decades of war, we made a promise that we’d look after them. It’s both a moral and national security imperative that we keep that promise,” Crow said in a statement.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Iowa Capital Dispatch

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Organizations should help affected people recover after a personal-data breach.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Your carry-on fits only if you sit on it. Do you try the airport sizer?

Your suitcase is slightly larger than the airline allows, although it has fit overhead on previous flights. Checking it costs extra and risks missing a connection. Other passengers have equally questionable bags and staff are checking inconsistently.

Does uneven enforcement weaken a traveler's duty to follow the rule?

Explore this quandary