Meet In CommonNews

Local

Feds 'disallow' $113M in Medicaid funds to Minnesota, citing fraud concerns

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Pine and Lakes Echo Journal

ST. PAUL — The federal government notified state officials over the weekend that it would "disallow" almost $113 million in Medicaid funds to Minnesota over fraud concerns. In a letter to state officials on Friday, Nov. 6, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services said it won’t reimburse Minnesota for $112,752,702 in Medicaid claims that the state had already submitted for services deemed high risk for fraud. In February, the federal government said it would withhold $259 million in Medicaid payments, and in April, announced it would withhold another $91 million. The $113 million the federal government said it won’t give back is just a portion of those withheld funds. The state is still waiting to hear about several million dollars in withheld funds from the federal government. Temporary Department of Human Services Commissioner John Connolly said in an email to staff that he plans to ask for more information before deciding whether to appeal the CMS decision on the $113 million.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Pine and Lakes Echo Journal

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

People should receive a clear explanation before consenting to personal-data use.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A disgraced billionaire's name is on the beloved campus library. Does it come down?

A major donor funded a beloved public building decades ago. New evidence shows they also caused serious harm that was legal and accepted by many peers at the time. Removing the name may jeopardize future donations.

What does an institution owe the truth when its history funded the present?

Explore this quandary