Meet In CommonNews

Local

Five Mitchell Kernel seniors recognized for committing to play college sports

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Daily Republic

MITCHELL — Five Mitchell High School seniors were recognized on Tuesday for committing to play sports at the collegiate level in 2026-27. Mitchell athletes recognized included: Lincoln Bottum attending Morningside University for baseball Anna Eliason is attending Augustana University for golf Frances Kranz is attending Dakota Wesleyan University for wrestling Mia Larson is attending University of Sioux Falls for golf Presley Meyerink is attending Dakota Wesleyan University for golf On the baseball diamond, Bottum bats right, throws right, plays third base and pitches. For the Mitchell High School spring baseball team, Bottum hit .313 with a .465 on-base percentage, 11 RBIs, and 12 runs scored, and threw eight innings on the mound with a 1.75 ERA. He played travel baseball for the Sanford Sports Academy under-17 team last summer and hit .308 with a .432 on-base percentage, 12 RBIs and 21 runs scored.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Daily Republic

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Related coverage

Community Poll

Major sporting rule changes should be tested before permanent adoption.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

You inherit a fortune made in ways you despise. Can you keep it?

You inherit a substantial sum from a relative who accumulated it through practices you consider exploitative. Keeping it would improve your family's security; donating it could support people harmed by similar practices.

Can ownership be morally clean when its history is not?

Explore this quandary