Meet In CommonNews

Local

Fixing Light Pollution, Modifying Road Diet Considered by Council

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Town Topics

By Anne Levin Princeton Council heard presentations at its Monday, November 9, meeting on light pollution from the Princeton Environmental Commission (PEC); and on modifying the scope of work for the previously authorized North Harrison Street Improvement Project, from a member of the municipal staff. Also presented to the governing body was a report by Eagle Scout Zafir Shamsi, about the new kiosk he has constructed at the Rogers Wildlife Refuge, for his service project. Shamsi told Council members that the new, weather-resistant kiosk is completed after some 120 hours of work, receiving applause for his efforts. Council adopted an ordinance establishing a separate, special services charge for the redaction of body-worn and in-vehicle camera footage by police. Before voting in favor, Councilman Leighton Newlin said he had concerns about people who can’t afford the charge for the footage.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Town Topics

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Automated tools should be tested with the people expected to use them.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

You inherit a fortune made in ways you despise. Can you keep it?

You inherit a substantial sum from a relative who accumulated it through practices you consider exploitative. Keeping it would improve your family's security; donating it could support people harmed by similar practices.

Can ownership be morally clean when its history is not?

Explore this quandary