Meet In CommonNews

Local

Former Anthropic researcher urges slower AI development, warns of tech dangers

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: The Stanford Daily

Jacob Coxon, a former OpenAI and Anthropic researcher who resigned over the technology’s risks, urged awareness of artificial intelligence’s (AI) dangers and called for a slowdown at an event on Monday. Coxon spoke to a crowd of around 200 people at a conversation with political science professor Robert Reich M.A. ’98 Ph.D. ’98, sponsored by Stanford’s Institute for Human-Centered AI (HAI). In September, Coxon made headlines after resigning from Anthropic and posting a viral X post that criticized OpenAI and Anthropic for developing AI and recursive self improvement (RSI) too quickly, which he said is raising the risk of human extinction. RSI refers to the process of AI improving itself without human intervention, which experts have warned could make AI harder to control. To reduce the risks, Coxon called for political activism focused on pressuring governments to slow down AI development.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at The Stanford Daily

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Public contracts should consider quality and reliability, even when the lowest bid costs less.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Everyone exaggerates on dating apps. Are two imaginary inches harmless?

A friend adds two inches to their listed height because they believe filters exclude them before personality has a chance. They plan to be charming enough that a date will not care once they meet in person.

Can deception be a fair response to superficial gatekeeping?

Explore this quandary