Meet In CommonNews

Local

Former sheriff Corpus says county should pay her legal fees

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Palo Alto Daily Post

Former San Mateo County Sheriff Christina Corpus has filed a claim against the county, saying it should have paid her legal fees in two lawsuits filed against her by a deputy and a former assistant. Corpus claims the county has a legal obligation to pay for her attorney’s fees because the alleged incidents occurred during her employment with the sheriff’s office. The county stopped paying for Corpus’ defense after she was fired by the Board of Supervisors on Oct. 14, 2025. Corpus wants reimbursement for defense fees and expenses in the Carlos Tapia and Valerie Barnes lawsuits, Kevin Ortiz, a spokesman for the San Francisco-based law firm, Quadra and Coll LLP, said in a statement yesterday. “Officials cannot turn their hostility toward a former sheriff into a lawful basis for forcing her to personally finance the defense of claims arising from her public service,” said one of Corpus’ various attorneys, James Quadra.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Palo Alto Daily Post

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Conservation policies should include practical support for affected local livelihoods.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A reserved meeting room has been empty for twenty minutes. Can your group take it?

Every library study room is occupied except one marked reserved. Its booking began twenty minutes ago and nobody has appeared. Your group has an urgent presentation to prepare, while library rules say reservations remain valid for half an hour.

When may obvious nonuse defeat a formal claim?

Explore this quandary