Meet In CommonNews

Local

Fraud Or Incompetence? Lawmakers Probe Homeless Housing Program

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Honolulu Civil Beat

The charges had no apparent connection to homelessness: office space, laptops, food and drink — including beer. An oceanview condo in Wailuku. A parking ticket. Steel-toed boots. Jeans from Nordstrom Rack. But HomeAid, the state’s homeless contractor, billed Hawaiʻi taxpayers. And the state paid. State lawmakers got an earful at a briefing on Thursday and were left deeply dissatisfied with the answers provided by some of the key architects of the state kauhale program, Gov. Josh Green’s signature effort to address homelessness. “Is it fraud, or is it incompetence?” House Rep. Ikaika Olds asked the state leaders of the program, Joe Campos and Jun Yang. They didn’t answer. The state senate briefing Thursday was the first opportunity lawmakers have had to pose direct questions after a scathing audit of the state’s management of the initiative identified more than $13 million in questionable or unauthorized payments through no-bid contracts with its sole provider, HomeAid Hawaiʻi.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Honolulu Civil Beat

Featured places to meet in Wailuku, HI

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

A Saigon Cafe

A Saigon Cafe 1792 East Main Street Wailuku, HI, 96793 US

City guide for Wailuku, HI

Community Poll

A company's growth matters less than whether its customers receive better service.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A parent clearly built the winning science project. Who should lose the prize?

An elementary student submits an elaborate science project far beyond their apparent ability. The parent proudly describes working together all weekend, and the child clearly learned something, but other students completed simpler projects themselves.

What is a fair response when help improves learning but distorts achievement?

Explore this quandary