Meet In CommonNews

Local

French lawmakers seek to add gigabyte tax to internet service providers in 2027 budget

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Human Events

French National Assembly Original/AIReading modeReadingAaPaperAaSepiaAaNightThe lower house of the French Parliament, the National Assembly, voted on Friday to include a tax on "producers of digital data" in the 2027 budget. The lawmakers believe this could result in a net gain of €10 billion per year. The amendment was "tabled by deputy Laurent Lhardit, was passed against the advice of the government and the budget's rapporteur général" and was adopted by 11 to 10 votes, reports Dealroom. The tax would force internet service providers to measure "the volume of data each content provider and content delivery network sends to their customer" and then pay 5.5 cents for every gigabyte they deliver to French users, the outlet said. Those internet service providers named in the amendment to the 2027 budget include Google, Meta, Amazon, Netflix and Akami.These companies alone provide about half the internet traffic in the entire nation.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Human Events

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Removing outdated rules is worthwhile even when it reduces some existing protections.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A $300 package lands at your door by mistake. Do you keep it?

A package containing expensive headphones arrives with your address but another person's name. The retailer says it has already replaced the order and does not ask you to return it.

If no one appears to lose, what still makes keeping it right or wrong?

Explore this quandary