Meet In CommonNews

Local

GE Vernova (GEV) says SoftBank's $3.7 billion power equipment loss has no financial impact on it

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: AIStockWire

Key points GE Vernova shares swing on SoftBank's equipment loss GE Vernova still calls SoftBank a valued customer Why JPMorgan sees GE Vernova's turbine slots refilling GE Vernova (GEV) shares fell as much as 9.9% on Nov. 10 after SoftBank Group (SFTBY) reported a 597.2 billion yen ($3.73 billion) loss tied to power equipment for US AI data centers. The turbine maker's shares recovered to close at $797.04, down 3.9% and at their high for the day. SoftBank said the loss followed a change in its equipment procurement plans, but it didn't name its suppliers. GE Vernova supplies gas turbines for SoftBank's Ohio data center project, according to CNBC. GE Vernova said SoftBank remains a valued customer and that SoftBank's disclosure had "no negative or positive financial impact" on the company. SoftBank lost $2.85 billion in advance payments The loss sits with Silver Bands 7, a unit that SoftBank Group and its second Vision Fund have invested in.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at AIStockWire

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Polluters should pay cleanup costs even when the damage occurred many years ago.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Your family connection could get your child into their dream school. Do you use it?

A university argues that considering family ties builds loyalty and encourages donations that fund scholarships. Critics say the preference preserves inherited advantage and takes places from stronger applicants.

Can benefits to the whole institution justify an unequal admissions advantage?

Explore this quandary