Meet In CommonNews

Local

Gil Duran warns of Silicon Valley’s political influence

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: The Stanford Daily

Independent journalist and author of “The Nerd Reich” Gil Duran criticized Silicon Valley’s growing influence over American politics and warned against the political ambitions of technology billionaires during a talk at Green Library last Friday. At event, titled “On Technofascism,” Duran discussed his book “The Nerd Reich,” which examines the origins, strategies and ambitions of what he describes as Silicon Valley’s disregard for democratic institutions. It was cohosted by Stanford’s Public Interest Technology Lab (PIT Lab) and Stanford Critical AI, and sponsored by Stanford University Libraries. Throughout the talk, Duran argued that a group of technology billionaires and venture capitalists has sought to reshape American politics, prioritizing wealth and corporate power over maintaining democracy and long-standing institutions.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at The Stanford Daily

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Employers should help workers retrain when their jobs disappear.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

The night before the wedding, your friend admits serious doubts. Do you tell their partner?

On the night before a wedding, your closest friend says they are unsure they should marry but insists it is ordinary panic. They make you promise secrecy and plan to proceed. Their partner asks you directly whether everything is okay.

When does loyalty require breaking a confidence before an irreversible choice?

Explore this quandary