Meet In CommonNews

Local

Glaukos Sets $1B Revenue Target After Record Q3

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Orange County Business Journal

Glaukos Corp. is eyeing $1 billion in annual sales next year following a record third quarter. The ophthalmic drug and medical technology company on Oct. 28 reported revenue of $211 million, up 58% from a year ago and exceeding the $168.8 million expected by analysts. Growth was driven by strong demand for two products: iDose TR, a glaucoma treatment designed to continuously deliver medication inside the eye, and Epioxa, a treatment for keratoconus that launched in March. Epioxa is the first and only FDA-approved topical drug therapy for the rare, sight-threatening eye disease. The results prompted Glaukos to raise full-year 2026 revenue guidance by nearly $90 million at the midpoint. It’s now forecasting revenue of $775 million to $785 million, up from its previous forecast of $680 million to $700 million. Glaukos (NYSE: GKOS) shares jumped more than 33% after earnings, reaching a 52-week high of $248.75 on Oct. 30.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Orange County Business Journal

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Related coverage

Community Poll

Businesses that attract visitors should help reduce the disruption experienced by neighbors.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A parent clearly built the winning science project. Who should lose the prize?

An elementary student submits an elaborate science project far beyond their apparent ability. The parent proudly describes working together all weekend, and the child clearly learned something, but other students completed simpler projects themselves.

What is a fair response when help improves learning but distorts achievement?

Explore this quandary