Meet In CommonNews

Local

Greenville Veterans Day at the nation’s 250th

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: The Plumas Sun

It began with the color guard. “Forward, march,” barked Bill Cook. Cook is not only a veteran, he’s the post adjutant. “This is a special year for us,” he said. “250 years of this country’s history. The military has been a part of it, and we want to show our love and respect for our country.” And proudly they marched. “We not only had our post,” Cook said, “we had other veterans who decided to show up, and we invited them to march with us.” More than 150 people showed up to watch members of the Indian Valley American Legion Post 568 march down Greenville’s Main Street Nov. 11. Cook said the parade almost didn’t happen. “We heard earlier in the year there wasn’t going to be a parade,” he said. “So, the post got together and decided that we were going to march regardless.” Cook said he put the word out to the community and the response was clear. “This was a well-attended parade,” he said.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at The Plumas Sun

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

A merger should be approved only when there is a credible case that customers will benefit.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Software says a student cheated with AI. Is that enough to fail the paper?

A teacher suspects several essays were written with AI. Detection software marks one student's work as highly likely to be generated, but the software is known to make mistakes and the student denies using it.

How should responsibility be assigned when evidence is powerful but unreliable?

Explore this quandary