Meet In CommonNews

Local

Guest commentary: The first AI mistake happens before you install anything

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Pacific Coast Business Times

By Eric Zackrison With so much information out there and so much hype about AI and agents, it is easy to get caught up in the shiny newtool. I was just working with a client last week who told me they wanted to start using a new AI scheduling tool and asked me how I thought they could integrate it into their workflow. That is exactly what I keep seeing, and it is also exactly backward. In deciding what tools to integrate, leaders should always start with the work itself, not the tool. The first step is to look at the work; without a clear understanding of the workflows, AI agents will only muck things up. So, take the time to map who does what and what the process looks like. Pay particular attention to repetitive tasks or tasks that are seen as mundane or simple. Things like data entry, summarizing meetings, scheduling, drafting routine emails, matching invoices to orders or pulling together weekly reports.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Pacific Coast Business Times

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Interviewers should challenge powerful guests even when doing so risks losing future access.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Your family wants an AI to settle an old argument. Would you hand over the group chat?

A recurring family dispute has reached the point where nobody agrees on what was actually said. Your cousin proposes uploading five years of the family group chat to an AI that can reconstruct events, flag contradictions, and recommend a fair resolution. Nearly everyone agrees—but one relative refuses.

Can a tool make a family argument fair without turning intimacy into evidence?

Explore this quandary