Meet In CommonNews

Local

Guest Opinion: Measure J isn't really about Cubberley. Vote no.

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Palo Alto Online

Measure J is misleading. It is not about improving the Cubberley site, as many residents assume, nor is it about authorizing the city to spend $65.5 million to purchase 7 acres from the school district. Rather, Measure J only asks voters to approve a half-cent sales tax increase in Palo Alto, from 9.75% to 10.25%, that will generate $15.6 million each year for years to come – there is no sunset clause. And by law, this tax money must go directly into the city’s general fund; once it’s there, our council and future council members can use money in this fund for anything they desire. And that is the critical problem with Measure J — there is no guarantee that future councils will spend the $15.6 million that the measure will generate every year on Cubberley. In fact, there is a slim chance that five or 10 years from now that money could be spent on new problems, like flooding or shore erosion. City officials acknowledged this.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Palo Alto Online

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Communities should test major changes on a small scale before making them permanent.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

You know the relationship is over, but the vacation is nonrefundable. Do you wait to break up?

You have decided to end a year-long relationship. In five days, you are both leaving on an expensive vacation that cannot be refunded or transferred. Your partner is excited and believes the relationship is thriving.

Can avoiding financial waste justify delaying a painful truth?

Explore this quandary