Meet In CommonNews

Local

House maneuver clears path for vote on Major Richard Star Act

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Army Times

Antonio Gordon estimates that a federal policy has withheld nearly $100,000 in military retired pay from him since his medical retirement from the Army in December 2019. Under the concurrent receipt policy, some combat-injured retirees have their military retired pay reduced when they receive Department of Veterans Affairs disability compensation. “All of my retirement pay gets wiped out,” Gordon said. Gordon is among the veterans seeking passage of the Major Richard Star Act, legislation that would allow eligible combat-injured retirees to receive their full military retired pay and VA disability compensation. The measure has attracted broad bipartisan support but has repeatedly stalled before reaching a final vote At a Capitol Hill news conference Monday, Rep. Mark Takano of California, the ranking Democrat on the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee, joined lawmakers, veterans organizations and combat-injured veterans in urging Congress to advance the standalone bill.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Army Times

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Residents should have a practical way to appeal decisions made by unelected public bodies.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A $300 package lands at your door by mistake. Do you keep it?

A package containing expensive headphones arrives with your address but another person's name. The retailer says it has already replaced the order and does not ask you to return it.

If no one appears to lose, what still makes keeping it right or wrong?

Explore this quandary