Meet In CommonNews

Local

How Lindsey Graham Lost the Midterms

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Compact

The biggest political loser of the 2026 midterms wasn’t even on the ballot—because he’d died nearly four months earlier. This election was not so much a referendum on Donald Trump as it was a referendum on Sen. Lindsey Graham. The Republican Party that faced voters on Nov. 3 was not the party Trump led on election night 2024. It was instead a GOP defined by the late Senator Graham’s vision of the party, which the Trump administration had unwisely, indeed unfathomably, chosen to adopt as its own. Trump had a successful formula. Why did he change it? His critics will insist he didn’t: He was judged on his record of immigration enforcement, tariffs, and zero tolerance of Iran’s nuclear ambitions. These were themes he campaigned on two years ago, and in the time since then his administration has delivered dramatically hardline policies on all three of those fronts.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Compact

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Residents' quality of life can justify caps on tourism even when businesses lose income.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

The company allows an $80 dinner. Is ordering the lobster fair game?

During work travel, company policy permits an expensive dinner. A modest option is nearby, but colleagues choose the nicest restaurant because the company can easily afford it and everyone is within the stated limit.

Is following a rule enough when you are spending someone else's money?

Explore this quandary