Meet In CommonNews

Local

ICE detains individual in East Palo Alto in targeted arrest

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Palo Alto Online

An individual was detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement outside Cardenas Market in East Palo Alto, the San Mateo County Rapid Response Hotline confirmed this morning. The hotline stated that the arrest was a targeted operation and that there is no ICE raid or detention of people on the street. ICE is no longer present at the market, the hotline added. The family of the detained individual declined to release more information to the media about their legal assistance or the current location of the detainee. Faith In Action Bay Area, which manages the hotline, said its team is in the process of providing legal support and other resources to the family. An individual called in the ICE sighting around 11:15 a.m. on Thursday, and the hotline was able to make contact with the family within 15 or 20 minutes. A hotline operator said this type of targeted arrest is not uncommon.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Palo Alto Online

Featured places to meet in East Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Starbucks

Starbucks 1745 East Bayshore Boulevard Palo Alto, CA, USA

Las michoacanitas

Las michoacanitas 2373 University Avenue East Palo Alto, CA, 94303 US

McDonald's

McDonald's 1721 East Bayshore Avenue East Palo Alto, CA, 94303 US

McDonald's

McDonald's 2401 University Avenue East Palo Alto, CA, 94303 US

City guide for East Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Environmental transitions should include financial help for people least able to afford change.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A $300 package lands at your door by mistake. Do you keep it?

A package containing expensive headphones arrives with your address but another person's name. The retailer says it has already replaced the order and does not ask you to return it.

If no one appears to lose, what still makes keeping it right or wrong?

Explore this quandary