Meet In CommonNews

Local

“In Many Ways, I Agree”: Jet Li Admitted Fans Had a Point About Romeo Must Die’s Disappointing Action

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Fortress of Solitude

Romeo Must Die (2000) is an important film in Jet Li’s career. Not because it’s an incredible piece of filmmaking or genre-defining masterpiece, but because it was his first leading role in a Hollywood production after establishing himself as a superstar of Hong Kong action cinema. Li is back in the spotlight, too: after six years away from the screen, he returned in Blades of the Guardians (2026). Directed by Andrzej Bartkowiak, whose filmography includes movies such as Doom and Street Fighter: The Legend of Chun-Li, Romeo Must Die sees Li share the screen with the late singer Aaliyah in a radical retelling of Romeo and Juliet. While it received mostly negative reviews at the time of its release [34% on Rotten Tomatoes], it made $91 million from a budget of $25 million and went on to become a cult classic. Say what you want about it, but this movie features many violent delights. Li, though, was fully aware of the film’s initial reception and didn’t shy away from the criticism.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Fortress of Solitude

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Courts should protect careful consideration even when this slows case processing.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

You love the free sample but will never buy it. How many times may you circle back?

A warehouse store is offering delicious samples. You have no intention of purchasing the product, but the employee seems bored and has trays to spare. After taking two, you consider removing your jacket and returning for a third.

Is exploiting generosity wrong when the giver appears not to care?

Explore this quandary