Meet In CommonNews

Local

Information literacy in the age of search engines

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Engevity News

Information literacy is the ability to notice when information is needed, then find, judge, and use it well. Search engines handle the finding in seconds. The judging may be the hard part now. The term dates to a 1974 report by Paul Zurkowski, and the American Library Association fixed the modern definition in 1989. That definition has barely changed, but the setting has. A card catalog offered a short shelf of options, while a results page offers millions, ranked in ways the searcher rarely sees. The catalog waited for a query. The engine volunteers an answer. The site's literacy explainers treat that shift as the central problem of the field. The stakes are concrete. Journals that mimic real science while skipping real review can sit one result below genuine papers. The guide to how to spot a predatory journal walks through the tells. Telling them apart is information literacy in daily practice. Where did the term come from? The phrase first saw print in 1974.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Engevity News

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Creators should be compensated when their work is used commercially to train AI systems.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

The mayor is excellent at the job—and secretly cheating on a spouse. Is that news?

A local official is effective, honest in office, and privately having an affair. A journalist can verify it but finds no misuse of public resources or direct connection to official duties.

Does private dishonesty reveal something citizens are entitled to judge?

Explore this quandary