Meet In CommonNews

Local

Jensen Huang ’92 admits to affair with alleged Chinese spy

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: The Stanford Daily

Nvidia CEO Jen-Hsun “Jensen” Huang M.S. ’92 admitted on Sunday to having an extramarital affair with a partner company executive who is a Chinese spy, according to American intelligence. In response, the Nvidia board has opened an independent investigation and stated that Jensen Huang will retain his leadership role. Jensen Huang and Nvidia have closely collaborated with Stanford in the past. In 2010, the Jen-Hsun Huang Engineering Center was dedicated to Jensen Huang after he and his wife donated $30 million toward its construction. Two years ago, Nvidia partnered with Stanford to create the Marlowe supercomputer cluster for University researchers. Earlier this year, the Marlowe-Nvidia joint initiative began connecting Stanford researchers with Nvidia research teams and solutions architects via private guidance sessions. The Daily has reached out to the University for comment.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at The Stanford Daily

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

People selling health products should provide evidence for their claimed benefits.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

You inherit a fortune made in ways you despise. Can you keep it?

You inherit a substantial sum from a relative who accumulated it through practices you consider exploitative. Keeping it would improve your family's security; donating it could support people harmed by similar practices.

Can ownership be morally clean when its history is not?

Explore this quandary