Business
Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.
Source: WSJ.com: Markets
Nvidia’s crisis divides the AI trade between companies dependent on Huang’s patronage, and those that didn’t need his chips or financing deals.
This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.
Read the original at WSJ.com: MarketsExplore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.
Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US
Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US
Celia's Mexican Restaurant 3740 West El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, USA
Hobee's Restaurant 4222 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, US
WSJ.com: US Business · Business
The world’s most consequential AI CEO is out after two affairs — one with a suspected spy. Here’s how it all unfolded.
WSJ.com: US Business · Business
Nvidia Chief Executive Jensen Huang has resigned after two extramarital affairs, including one with a suspected Chinese spy and another with an employee.
WSJ.com: US Business · Business
Kang Wei appeared to accept that his wife Alice Huang was in a romantic relationship and spoke openly of her closeness to the Nvidia chief.
WSJ.com: US Business · Business
Nvidia’s first and only CEO turned semiconductors designed for videogames into the engine of the next technology revolution.
WSJ.com: US Business · Business
The chorus of support among the tech elite for Nvidia’s co-founder underscores the seismic shifting of power under way within the industry.
WSJ.com: US Business · Business
Interim CEO Colette Kress has questioned some Huang dealmaking. He called her “a deer in the headlights.”
Community Poll
Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.
Do you agree or disagree?
Common Quandary
Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.
While clearing your father's attic, you find a rare book stamped by the local library and due in 1986. The library would be thrilled to recover it, but returning it openly would expose a secret he apparently kept for decades—and might produce a spectacular overdue fine.
Does making an old wrong right require admitting who did it?
