Meet In CommonNews

Local

Jim Caviezel Was “Heartbroken” Over Losing Jesus, But Says Gibson’s Sequels Can’t Touch Passion of the Christ

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Fortress of Solitude

Fans of Mel Gibson’s The Passion of the Christ had to wait roughly 20 years before the promised sequel went into production. And during that time actor Jim Caviezel was on standby, ready to play Jesus on the big screen again. Except, things didn’t turn out as planned. Aside from Caviezel aging (which was meant to be fixed with de-aging tech) and how costly that fix would have been, Icon, Mel Gibson’s production company, decided to go in a completely different direction with the sequel films – which meant casting new actors, including Finnish actor Jaakko Ohtonen (36 when he was cast and best known for The Last Kingdom) as the new Christ. Why Jim Caviezel Isn’t Returning in The Resurrection of the Christ In a new interview with Raymond Arroyo on the Arroyo Grande podcast , the 58-year-old actor has finally spoken out and revealed that he was “heartbroken” about losing the role.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Fortress of Solitude

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Environmental transitions should include financial help for people least able to afford change.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Scientists can edit mosquitoes until a deadly disease disappears. Who gets to say yes?

Scientists can potentially release modified mosquitoes whose genes would spread through wild populations and sharply reduce a deadly disease. The ecological effects could cross borders and may be impossible to reverse.

Who may authorize an irreversible change intended to save lives?

Explore this quandary