Meet In CommonNews

Local

John Day City Council to hold public hearing at Nov. 17 meeting

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Blue Mountain Eagle (John Day)

JOHN DAY — John Day’s city council will enter into executive session and discuss some agenda items before holding a public hearing at its Nov. 17 meeting. The executive session will begin at 5:30 p.m. and is pursuant to ORS 192.660 2 (i): To review and evaluate the employment-related performance of the chief executive officer of any public body, a public officer, employee, or staff member who does not request an open hearing. The council will then move to open public session and discuss adopting Ordinance 26-05, which requires businesses within the City of John Day to have licenses for revenue and regulation. According to the meeting’s agenda, the ordinance would supersede and replace Title 3, Chapter 1 of the John Day City Code, which currently governs business licenses.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Blue Mountain Eagle (John Day)

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Customers' prepaid orders should receive special protection when a business fails.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

You inherit a fortune made in ways you despise. Can you keep it?

You inherit a substantial sum from a relative who accumulated it through practices you consider exploitative. Keeping it would improve your family's security; donating it could support people harmed by similar practices.

Can ownership be morally clean when its history is not?

Explore this quandary