Meet In CommonNews

Local

Lawmakers renew push for Minnesota Equal Rights Amendment ahead of 2027 DFL trifecta

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Pine and Lakes Echo Journal

ST. PAUL — The push for an Equal Rights Amendment to Minnesota's constitution is already underway ahead of the 2027 legislative session. DFL lawmakers and advocates are again hoping this is the year the Legislature can take the steps to explicitly ensure equal rights for Minnesotans and prohibit discrimination based on things like race, disability, gender identity, or pregnancy outcomes. If passed in the 2027 session, voters would see the question on their ballots in 2028 for final approval. Minnesota has already passed laws offering some of the protections spelled out in the ERA — abortion, for one — but doesn't have it written in the constitution. While some Minnesota Republicans have said they see abortion law as “settled,” and called the ERA "unnecessary," advocates argue an extra layer of protection is still needed, in case the 2023 abortion law were repealed by a future Legislature or a future Minnesota Supreme Court overturned the Doe v. Gomez ruling.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Pine and Lakes Echo Journal

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Local communities should share directly in the benefits of large energy projects.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

An old friend refuses to use someone's new name. Do you correct them at the reunion?

At a reunion, an old friend repeatedly uses the name a former classmate had years ago. They say shared history gives the old name affectionate meaning; the classmate has clearly introduced themselves with a different name.

When does preserving your shared past deny who someone is now?

Explore this quandary