Meet In CommonNews

Local

Linda Henigin and Avery Wang take the lead in Palo Alto school board race

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Palo Alto Online

Linda Henigin and Avery Wang took the early lead in the Palo Alto Board of Education race, according to Tuesday evening election results. Henigin, Wang and John Craig are running to replace board President Shounak Dharap, who will term out this fall, and board member Shana Segal, who will not be running again. Henigin, a district parent, longtime school employee, volunteer and math teacher, took the lead ahead of her competitors, securing approximately 38.7% of the vote, with 7,678 total votes. She retained her lead over the next two days. With 24,758 votes cast as of Thursday afternoon, Henigin had received 9,390 votes, while Wang had 8,630 votes, which placed him in a commanding position to win the second open seat. Craig trailed with 6,726 votes. Henigin, who gathered alongside supporters at Kirk’s SteakBurgers on Tuesday night, embraced her supporters when the results rolled out at approximately 8:01 p.m.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Palo Alto Online

Featured places to meet in Avery, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

City guide for Avery, CA

Related coverage

Community Poll

Sports venues should actively welcome first-time visitors and people attending alone.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Would you want a doctor to give you a fake pill if the lie might make you feel better?

A patient has persistent symptoms that have not responded to standard treatments. A harmless placebo may help, but its effect could weaken if the clinician fully explains that it contains no active medicine.

Can a beneficial deception respect the person it helps?

Explore this quandary