Meet In CommonNews

Local

Luzerne County identifies 10 high-priority bridges with serious or poor ratings

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Times Leader

While there are many bridge repair and replacement needs, Luzerne County has identified 10 spans as the highest priority based on their serious or poor ratings, according to a new report. This top 10 does not include other county-owned crossings already in design or construction. Tom Reilly, president of Reilly Associates in Pittston — the county’s outside engineer — presented the list as part of a county bridge overview at last week’s County Council work session. At least $12 million would be needed to address eight of the bridges, according to the estimates, and the cost projections for the remaining two is still under review. A synopsis of the top 10 bridges warranting attention, including comments made by Reilly last week: • Two Sutton Road bridges over Sutton Creek in Exeter Township — both concrete T-beam spans constructed in 1925. The first is 50 feet long and in poor condition.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Times Leader

Featured places to meet in Pittston, PA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Arby's

Arby's 309 Highway 315 Pittston, PA, 18640 US

Burger King

Burger King 390 Route 315 Highway Pittston, PA, 18640 US

Burger King

Burger King 301 Kennedy Boulevard Pittston, PA, 18640 US

Dunkin'

Dunkin' 801 Wyoming Avenue Pittston, PA, 18643 US

City guide for Pittston, PA

Community Poll

Temporary policies should require fresh approval before becoming permanent.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A pricey AI tutor can turn B students into A students. Should schools let them use it?

An effective AI tutor adapts to each student and dramatically improves performance, but its subscription is expensive. A public school cannot provide it to everyone and worries that allowing its use will deepen existing inequality.

Should access be limited when a beneficial tool cannot yet be shared fairly?

Explore this quandary