Meet In CommonNews

Local

Major development, comp plan questions leave Tetonia officials seeking help

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Teton Valley News

Tetonia planning and zoning commissioners agreed Nov. 2 that they need more time and more professional help to review PFG Idaho’s Pinnacle Peak development, which could grow the town from roughly 281 residents to nearly 1,512 if fully built out, and the city’s draft comprehensive plan.“This is beyond our pay grade,” said Commissioner Josh Weltman, who was the most vocal about the commission’s lack of support. He asked for “an attorney” to advise the commission and for the city to hire “another planning director who can work with us and represent the city.”Contract city planner Ashley Koehler said the city’s legal counsel will attend future meetings.The planning and zoning commission and the city council will meet jointly Nov. 16 at Tetonia City Hall to discuss the draft comprehensive plan and its future land use map.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Teton Valley News

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

News reports should clearly separate verified facts from the writer's interpretation.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A private joke from years ago goes public. How long should it follow the person who wrote it?

Someone shares a screenshot of a tasteless joke made years ago in a private friends' chat. The person who wrote it says they were performing for a small audience, have changed, and never agreed to have the message made public.

How private should speech remain when it reveals something troubling?

Explore this quandary