Meet In CommonNews

Local

Marines Who Lost Leave at the Oct. 1 Rollover Can Now Recover Up to 30 Days

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Military.com

By Robert Billard Published Nov 13, 2026, 10:53 AM EST Sign in to your Military.com account U.S. Marine Corps 1st Lt. Justin Griffis, an administrative officer with Marine Air Support Squadron 3, 3rd Marine Aircraft Wing (MAW) greets his daughters during a homecoming ceremony Aug. 23, 2012, at Marine Corps Air Station Miramar, Calif. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by PFC Melissa Eschenbrenner) For many Marines, Oct. 1 is the day unused leave above 60 days disappears. This year, qualifying Marines may get up to 30 of those days back. The Marine Corps has officially resumed special leave accrual approvals, according to MARADMIN 545/26, signed Nov. 4. The message implements designations the Secretary of the Navy published in ALNAV 056/26 in September. It is not a new bank of leave for the whole force. Only qualifying Marines can apply to restore leave they already earned and then lost at the fiscal-year rollover.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Military.com

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Organizations should explain important automated decisions in language people can understand.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

You inherit a fortune made in ways you despise. Can you keep it?

You inherit a substantial sum from a relative who accumulated it through practices you consider exploitative. Keeping it would improve your family's security; donating it could support people harmed by similar practices.

Can ownership be morally clean when its history is not?

Explore this quandary