Meet In CommonNews

Local

Martin McDonagh’s Wild Horse Nine feels oddly empty despite John Malkovich’s and Sam Rockwell’s performances

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: inlander.com

Rockwell and Malkovich predictably excel in Wild Horse Nine. Diego Araya Corvalán Stop me if you’ve heard this one before: Two professional killers go off on a vacation to a remote location while endlessly bickering with each other. They spend their days alternating between taking in the sights and feeling troubled by lightly ruminating on their respective pasts. Soon, we too begin to feel a heavy weight and discover something darker is motivating the trip in the first place. As we come to know the men, we realize that this journey will most certainly be the last for at least one of them.If this description brings to mind the 2008 film In Bruges, that wouldn’t be an off-target thought. However, it also wouldn’t be an off-target description of the new Wild Horse Nine. Further complicating things are both works are written and directed by Martin McDonagh, who, while not entirely copying himself, is clearly iterating on similar ideas and themes.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at inlander.com

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Temporary policies should require fresh approval before becoming permanent.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

You inherit a fortune made in ways you despise. Can you keep it?

You inherit a substantial sum from a relative who accumulated it through practices you consider exploitative. Keeping it would improve your family's security; donating it could support people harmed by similar practices.

Can ownership be morally clean when its history is not?

Explore this quandary