Meet In CommonNews

Local

MDOT says it’s time to remove political signs

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Lawrence County Press

With the 2026 campaign season coming to a close, the Mississippi Department of Transportation reminds political candidates and supporters to remove political signs, especially those along roadsides. Though MDOT removes campaign signs illegally placed within right-of-way on state highways, all campaign signage can contribute to our state’s multi-million-dollar litter problem. “Once elections are over, it’s time to clean up our act and prevent campaign signage from becoming unsightly litter,” said Brad White, MDOT executive director. “Elected officials aren’t the only ones who can participate in public service; we can all help preserve Mississippi’s natural beauty by keeping our roadsides litter-free and always placing trash where it belongs.” For political candidates and supporters with upcoming runoff elections, here are a few tips regarding campaign signage placement: Any illegally placed signs will be removed.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Lawrence County Press

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Environmental commitments should be judged by measured outcomes rather than announced targets.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

The company allows an $80 dinner. Is ordering the lobster fair game?

During work travel, company policy permits an expensive dinner. A modest option is nearby, but colleagues choose the nicest restaurant because the company can easily afford it and everyone is within the stated limit.

Is following a rule enough when you are spending someone else's money?

Explore this quandary