Meet In CommonNews

Local

Meet Colette Kress, the finance chief steering Nvidia through its first CEO transition

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Business Insider

Nvidia has named chief financial officer Colette Kress interim CEO after Jensen Huang resigned. Huang exited as Nvidia's board probed a foreign intelligence effort and his alleged affairs. Kress, seen as a potential successor, previously held finance roles at Cisco and Microsoft. Nvidia's longtime finance chief Colette Kress has been named interim CEO as a widening scandal brings Jensen Huang's 33-year tenure to an end. Kress's appointment on Thursday follows Huang's resignation, which the board said was effective immediately. The board said it is initiating a search for a permanent CEO and will "consider internal and external candidates." Nvidia's share price dropped more than 10% in premarket trading after announcing Huang's resignation. Huang stepped down after Nvidia's board opened an investigation into whether he was the target of a "foreign intelligence effort." He also admitted to being unfaithful to his wife in a memo.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Business Insider

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Businesses that attract visitors should help reduce the disruption experienced by neighbors.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Software says a student cheated with AI. Is that enough to fail the paper?

A teacher suspects several essays were written with AI. Detection software marks one student's work as highly likely to be generated, but the software is known to make mistakes and the student denies using it.

How should responsibility be assigned when evidence is powerful but unreliable?

Explore this quandary