Meet In CommonNews

Local

Megaspeed swaps its 'no evidence' statement for a pledge to cooperate with US investigators

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: AIStockWire

Key points What Megaspeed's new statement promises US investigators What Megaspeed's new statement leaves out How fast Megaspeed's revenue grew, per Singapore records Megaspeed, the Singapore data center company at the center of the scandal around Jensen Huang, pledged on Thursday to cooperate with US investigators. The company posted the new statement on its homepage in place of a December 2025 statement that said inspections had found no evidence it broke the law. Nvidia (NVDA) announced the same day that Huang had resigned as chief executive, and named finance chief Colette Kress interim CEO. Nvidia shares were at $162.14 at 9:53 a.m. ET on Thursday, down 6.7% from Wednesday's close of $173.73. Megaspeed says it hired a US law firm to count its GPUs The statement is dated Nov. 12 and signed by Tan Yong Pong, Megaspeed's chairman and CEO. It says Megaspeed "has cooperated with inspections by the U.S.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at AIStockWire

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Teams owe supporters honest explanations during long periods of poor results.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

An app can text exactly like someone you lost. Would you keep talking to it?

A service can create a conversational likeness from a deceased person's messages and recordings. A grieving family member finds it comforting, although the deceased never consented to this use of their data.

Can comfort justify creating a voice the dead never authorized?

Explore this quandary