Meet In CommonNews

Local

Million-dollar incomes, monthly rent: Naples, Tampa gain wealthy tenants

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Business Observer

A seven-figure income doesn’t always come with a mortgage. From Naples to Tampa Bay, households earning at least $1 million a year are increasingly entering the rental housing market, according to a new RentCafe report. Sarasota also made the apartment search website’s list of emerging markets for those high earners. Naples posted the country’s second-fastest growth in millionaire renter households on RentCafe’s ranking, trailing only Houston. Its estimate rose from seven households to 76, a 986% increase. That put Naples level with the much larger Tampa metro, where the estimated number climbed from 21 to 76, up 262%. Tampa ranked No. 15 for growth, edging past the national increase of 229%. The figures, published Oct. 15, come from RentCafe’s analysis of U.S. Census Bureau data it accessed through the Integrated Public Use Microdata Series, or IPUMS. RentCafe defines “millionaire” households as those with a combined annual income of at least $1 million.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Business Observer

Featured places to meet in Naples, FL

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

239 Nutrition

239 Nutrition 2069 Pine Ridge Road Naples, FL, 34109 US

City guide for Naples, FL

Community Poll

Research participants' welfare should take priority over possible benefits to society.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Software says a student cheated with AI. Is that enough to fail the paper?

A teacher suspects several essays were written with AI. Detection software marks one student's work as highly likely to be generated, but the software is known to make mistakes and the student denies using it.

How should responsibility be assigned when evidence is powerful but unreliable?

Explore this quandary