Meet In CommonNews

Local

Milly 48 Film Festival challenges filmmakers to create short films in 48 hours

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: The Union-Recorder

The Milly 48 Film Festival, in partnership with Georgia College & State University’s School of Continuing and Professional Studies, challenges teams to write, shoot and edit an original short film in 48 hours, from Friday, Nov. 20, to Sunday, Nov. 22. The kickoff, the awards and film screening will take place at The Depot in Milledgeville. The event is open to all ages and experience levels. Team registration closes Monday, Nov. 16. At the kickoff on Friday at 6 p.m. at The Depot, each team will receive a genre and three surprise elements: a character, a line of dialogue and a prop that must appear in the film. Submissions will be reviewed by a panel of judges and select films will be presented at the Sunday awards ceremony, held at the same venue. The screening is free and open to the public. Attendees must reserve seats in advance as space is limited. Winning teams will receive prizes donated by sponsoring businesses.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at The Union-Recorder

Featured places to meet in Milledgeville, GA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Amici's

Amici's Milledgeville, GA, 31061 US

Arby's

Arby's 2500 North Columbia Street Milledgeville, GA, 31061 US

City guide for Milledgeville, GA

Community Poll

Essential public services should be protected even when they operate at a financial loss.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Software says a student cheated with AI. Is that enough to fail the paper?

A teacher suspects several essays were written with AI. Detection software marks one student's work as highly likely to be generated, but the software is known to make mistakes and the student denies using it.

How should responsibility be assigned when evidence is powerful but unreliable?

Explore this quandary