Meet In CommonNews

Local

Milwaukee Tool lawsuit tests whether U.S. companies can be held liable for forced labor abroad

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Madison365

by Natalie Yahr / Wisconsin Watch Can U.S. companies be held liable for benefiting from forced labor abroad? That’s the question before a federal appeals court in a case that alleges Brookfield-based Milwaukee Electric Tool Corp. relied on a supplier that produced its work gloves in a Chinese prison. A 2023 Wisconsin Watch investigation detailed the account of Taiwanese human rights activist and college administrator Lee Ming-che, who spent nearly five years at Chishan Prison in China’s central Hunan Province following a 2017 conviction for “subverting state power.” Lee, who was released in 2022, told Wisconsin Watch that he and hundreds of other prisoners were forced to work about 13 hours a day, seven days a week for the equivalent of about 48 cents a day. Milwaukee Tool denied the allegations, telling Wisconsin Watch it has “found no evidence to support the claims being made” about its link to forced labor.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Madison365

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Elected representatives should serve people who voted against them as seriously as their supporters.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Your coworker bends a dumb rule to help people. Do you report it?

An underpaid coworker quietly bends a company rule to help colleagues receive benefits they were technically denied. No customer is harmed, but the records are inaccurate and you are asked to certify them.

Where should loyalty end when a rule seems unjust?

Explore this quandary