Meet In CommonNews

Local

Missouri attorney general issues guidance on protecting children from online exploitation

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Kirksville Daily Express

JEFFERSON CITY — Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway has issued new guidance outlining legal remedies and removal steps for parents if explicit or manipulated images of their children are shared online. Under Chapter 573 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri, it is a felony offense to share, threaten to share, or possess sexually explicit depictions of minors—a prohibition that explicitly encompasses artificial intelligence and computer-generated deepfake imagery. State officials urged parents to take immediate action to preserve evidence, notify law enforcement, and halt the spread of harmful material if they discover an explicit image involving their child. “Child exploitation in any form is unacceptable. As a mother, I can’t imagine anything more horrifying than kids being victimized,” Hanaway said. “We supported the Take It Down Act because parents need real tools to remove harmful content and protect their children.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Kirksville Daily Express

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

People should receive a clear explanation before consenting to personal-data use.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A reserved meeting room has been empty for twenty minutes. Can your group take it?

Every library study room is occupied except one marked reserved. Its booking began twenty minutes ago and nobody has appeared. Your group has an urgent presentation to prepare, while library rules say reservations remain valid for half an hour.

When may obvious nonuse defeat a formal claim?

Explore this quandary