Meet In CommonNews

Local

Montana Public Service Commission approves NorthWestern Energy, Black Hills Corp. merger

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: South Dakota Searchlight

The Montana Public Service Commission approved the $15.4 billion NorthWestern Energy and Black Hills Corp. merger on Tuesday. The new company, once merged, will serve 2.1 million electric and natural gas customers in Montana, Arkansas, Colorado, Iowa, Kansas, South Dakota, Nebraska and Wyoming. In a split vote, the PSC supported the deal, with Commissioner Randy Pinocci in opposition and PSC President Jeff Welborn a “reluctant” no. Commissioners Jennifer Fielder, Annie Bukacek and Kirk Bushman voted yes. Montana is the last state that needed to vote on the deal, announced in August 2025. South Dakota and Nebraska regulators already approved it, and NorthWestern said it has secured federal regulatory approvals. In a statement, Northwestern spokesperson Jo Dee Black said company officials will review the order, and they continue to believe the merger is in the interest of customers.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at South Dakota Searchlight

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Public funding for a small group can be justified when the wider community also benefits.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A pricey AI tutor can turn B students into A students. Should schools let them use it?

An effective AI tutor adapts to each student and dramatically improves performance, but its subscription is expensive. A public school cannot provide it to everyone and worries that allowing its use will deepen existing inequality.

Should access be limited when a beneficial tool cannot yet be shared fairly?

Explore this quandary