Meet In CommonNews

Local

Moritz Library Assembly Room Welcomes Kansas Court of Appeals

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Benedictine College

Facebook X/Twitter LinkedIn Email On Tuesday, October 27, three judges of the Kansas Court of Appeals heard oral arguments on two cases while surrounded by the history and grandeur of the Assembly Room in the Independence Hall-inspired Moritz Library in D’Aniello Hall on the Benedictine College campus in Atchison, Kansas. Chief Judge Sarah Warner, along with Judge Karen Arnold-Burger and Judge Rachel Pickering, conducted the proceedings in the historically accurate reproduction of the room in Philadelphia where the Declaration of Independence and U.S. Constitution were debated and signed. Students and public behind the ‘bar’ in the Assembly Room during the Kansas Court of Appeals cases. “This was a fantastic opportunity for our students and the general public to see how appellate advocacy actually works,” said Dr. Kevin Vance, Director of the Center for Constitutional Liberty at Benedictine College.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Benedictine College

Featured places to meet in Atchison, KS

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Casey's

Casey's 1629 Main Street Atchison, KS, 66002 US

Daylight Donuts

Daylight Donuts 714 Commercial Street Atchison, KS, 66002 US

City guide for Atchison, KS

Community Poll

Communities should help financially sustain independent local reporting.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A patient records every doctor visit for their followers. Can the doctor refuse to be filmed?

A patient with a large social-media following livestreams their health journey and wants to record every appointment. They say the videos help others and keep doctors accountable. Their physician finds the camera distracting and worries that casual remarks will be edited out of context.

Whose comfort should control a conversation about one person's body and another person's work?

Explore this quandary