Meet In CommonNews

Local

NCHC suspends Western Michigan forward Adam Benák

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Grand Forks Herald

GRAND FORKS — The National Collegiate Hockey Conference has suspended Western Michigan forward Adam Benák for one game for slashing UND's Cody Croal on Saturday night. The slash occurred as Croal scored an empty-net goal to seal a 4-1 UND victory in Ralph Engelstad Arena. Benák swung his stick with one hand at Croal as he released the puck. The blade of Benák's stick hit Croal in the throat. Croal immediately crumpled to the ice behind the net. A melee ensued in the corner. Croal eventually got up, found Benák, locked up with him and said a few words. NCHC officials Jake Jackson and Sterling Egan assessed Benák a five-minute major and a game misconduct, which carries an automatic ejection but not suspension. NCHC commissioner Heather Weems and director of officiating Mike Schmitt, who both attended the game, reviewed the play as part of the league's standard procedure. They review all major penalties.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Grand Forks Herald

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Urgent public needs can justify simplifying normal approval procedures.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A disgraced billionaire's name is on the beloved campus library. Does it come down?

A major donor funded a beloved public building decades ago. New evidence shows they also caused serious harm that was legal and accepted by many peers at the time. Removing the name may jeopardize future donations.

What does an institution owe the truth when its history funded the present?

Explore this quandary