Meet In CommonNews

Local

NCHC to review Adam Benák's slash on Cody Croal

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Grand Forks Herald

GRAND FORKS — The National Collegiate Hockey Conference will review Adam Benák's slash on UND forward Cody Croal late in Saturday night's game in Ralph Engelstad Arena — part of the league's standard procedure. The slash occurred as Croal put the puck into an empty net with 2:03 remaining to solidify UND's 4-1 win over Western Michigan. Benák, Western Michigan's top-line center and the national rookie of the month for October, took a one-handed swing at Croal with his stick. Benák's stick caught Croal in the neck and the UND junior forward immediately dropped behind the net. A melee ensued. Croal eventually got up, skated to Benák, locked up with him and yelled at him. NCHC officials Jake Jackson and Sterling Egan called a five-minute major and a game misconduct after video review. A game misconduct triggers an automatic ejection, but not a suspension. The league reviews all five-minute major penalties for potential supplemental discipline.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Grand Forks Herald

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Schools should explain the purpose of a rule before punishing students for breaking it.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A parent clearly built the winning science project. Who should lose the prize?

An elementary student submits an elaborate science project far beyond their apparent ability. The parent proudly describes working together all weekend, and the child clearly learned something, but other students completed simpler projects themselves.

What is a fair response when help improves learning but distorts achievement?

Explore this quandary