Meet In CommonNews

Local

New bill slashes tribes’ role in projects that impact ancestral sites, water and wildlife

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: High Country News

In 2024, a subsidiary of the mining company Energy Fuels revived its plans to open the Roca Honda Uranium Mine in New Mexico near Mount Taylor, a place of cultural significance to at least 30 Native nations. The company had received expedited permitting under the Trump administration last year, and in mid-September, the Forest Service announced that it would begin to analyze the mine’s potential impacts under the National Environmental Policy Act, or NEPA. That process includes tribal consultation, which is critical to upholding tribes’ ability to protect cultural landscapes, wildlife and water, would change dramatically under the Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act, a permitting reform bill introduced by Western Republican and Democratic senators, including Sens. Martin Heinrich, D-N.M., and Mike Lee, R-Utah. The Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources is expected to vote on it after Congress returns on Nov. 9.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at High Country News

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

A club's identity belongs partly to its community, not solely to its owners.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

You both hate the invitation. Which partner has to become the excuse?

A couple receives an invitation neither wants to accept. One suggests claiming the other is ill, reasoning that friends will question a vague excuse but respect sickness. The proposed patient dislikes lying but also wants to stay home.

Is a shared lie fair when only one person's reputation carries it?

Explore this quandary