Meet In CommonNews

Local

New Maxwell Course Has Students as Grantmakers

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Syracuse University News

Syracuse University Impact Syracuse University Impact New Maxwell Course Has Students as Grantmakers Funded by The Philanthropy Lab, the course will let undergraduates review real proposals and decide how to award up to $85,000 to Central New York nonprofits. Jessica Youngman Nov. 11, 2026 Estimated Reading Time: Share × Video Player Central New York nonprofits will soon have a new set of funders to impress: Syracuse University undergraduates. Jiahuan Lu, associate professor of public administration and international affairs at the Maxwell School, has received support from The Philanthropy Lab to launch PAI 300 Nonprofits, Policy and Governance, a new course in which students review proposals from Central New York nonprofits and make real decisions about how to distribute up to $85,000 in funding. The course is open to undergraduate students across the University. It will convene on Tuesdays in the Spring 2027 semester from 9:30 a.m. to 12:15 p.m.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Syracuse University News

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Employers should measure outcomes instead of continuously monitoring workers' activity.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Your anonymous review could cost a coworker a promotion. Do you sign your name?

A company requests anonymous feedback about a colleague being considered for promotion. You have serious concerns based on direct experience, but anonymity prevents them from asking questions or understanding the context of your criticism.

Does honest criticism require accepting personal accountability for it?

Explore this quandary