Meet In CommonNews

Local

NH trans teens ask federal judge to pause rule banning Medicaid-funded gender-affirming care

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: New Hampshire Bulletin

In August, the Trump administration issued a new rule: no Medicaid funding for most types of gender-affirming care for children. Now, a group of transgender New Hampshire girls are suing the federal government to reverse the change, and U.S. District Court Judge Steven McAuliffe is deciding whether to pause the rule during the yearslong legal battle the lawsuit is likely to entail. The rule came from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services in August and took effect Oct. 13. The ban encompasses transition surgery and hormone blockers for those under 18. President Donald Trump and Republican Party leaders claim gender dysphoria isn’t real, a position at odds with most major medical organizations. During a hearing in Concord’s federal courthouse last month, attorneys from a coalition of nonprofits, including GLBTQ Legal Advocates and Defenders (commonly known as GLAD) and the ACLU of New Hampshire, pushed McAuliffe to grant a temporary injunction to pause the rule.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at New Hampshire Bulletin

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

New local ventures should actively contribute to the surrounding community.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

You inherit a fortune made in ways you despise. Can you keep it?

You inherit a substantial sum from a relative who accumulated it through practices you consider exploitative. Keeping it would improve your family's security; donating it could support people harmed by similar practices.

Can ownership be morally clean when its history is not?

Explore this quandary