Meet In CommonNews

Local

NJUS: Fuel Surcharge to increase, budget and audits still missing

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Nome Nugget

By Anna Lionas Starting with the next Nome Joint Utilities bill cycle, NJUS customers will see over double the generator fuel surcharge, Utility Manager John Handeland said at the board meeting Thursday. Customers will not see the surcharge rate as a line item on their utility bill. In February, NJUS began rolling the fuel surcharge into the electricity cost, Handeland told the Nugget, because it saved staff a lot of time in the billing process. The board discussed the increased fuel surcharge without the contextual understanding of its impact on the utility because the board has still not received the 2026 budget and are missing audits dating back five years. Board members expressed frustration over the cycle of requesting the budget and audits meeting after meeting with no follow through. “I asked for this stuff at the last meeting or two ago and you said you’d have it,” board member Larry Pederson said, directed to Handeland. “I did and I’ve been sick,” Handeland said.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Nome Nugget

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

People should receive a clear explanation before consenting to personal-data use.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Your new television goes on sale elsewhere. Can you return it and buy the identical one cheaper?

A week after buying a television, another store offers the same model for much less. Your retailer refuses to match the price but allows unopened-looking returns. You could carefully repack the perfectly functional set.

Is a generous return policy permission to reverse a deal for any reason?

Explore this quandary