Meet In CommonNews

Local

No Quit: Aces storm back to beat Benton

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: HomeTown Register

MT. CARMEL — "No Quit" is just one of the many defining characteristics of Mt. Carmel varsity football team, which stormed back from a 17-point deficit in the second half to beat the Benton Rangers and advance to the quarterfinals of the IHSA 3A football playoffs, 32-24.The first half was all Benton, as the Rangers took a 17 point lead into the locker room; but the Golden Aces scored three straight touchdowns in the third quarter to take the lead.Mt. Carmel’s special teams unit kick started the second half comeback, as senior Shain Meador returned the opening kickoff 80 yards for the touchdown. The Aces found the end zone again for the two point try, making it a two score game, 8-17.The Aces fired right back during the kick-off, as Mt. Carmel recovered their own onside kick to take back over on offense. Deisher added to his stats again, passing to Meador for another trip to the red zone.Mt.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at HomeTown Register

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Urgent public needs can justify simplifying normal approval procedures.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Your family connection could get your child into their dream school. Do you use it?

A university argues that considering family ties builds loyalty and encourages donations that fund scholarships. Critics say the preference preserves inherited advantage and takes places from stronger applicants.

Can benefits to the whole institution justify an unequal admissions advantage?

Explore this quandary