Meet In CommonNews

Local

Nobody Wants a McDonald’s in Chinatown

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: The Stranger

McDonald’s wants to put a new store in Seattle’s Chinatown-International District (CID). Almost nobody thinks that’s a good idea. They are decidedly not loving it. Last night, about 80 CID residents and supporters packed the meeting of the International Special Review District (ISRD), the neighborhood’s historic preservation board. Impassioned public comments, handmade protest signs in Chinese and English, and several people in Ronald McDonald-esque clown masks injected the typically sleepy meeting with life. McDonald’s wants to place its new franchise on the corner of 4th Avenue South and South Jackson Street, along a busy thoroughfare close to the regional transit hub and sports stadiums. The storefront has remained vacant since Bartell Drugs closed four years ago. In submitting its proposal, Mickey D’s managed a remarkable feat: Uniting the community to take action in the span of less than a week.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at The Stranger

Featured places to meet in Seattle, WA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Cortina

Cortina 621 Union Street Seattle, WA, USA

¡Que Chimba!

¡Que Chimba! 9601 16th Avenue Southwest Seattle, WA, 98106 US

City guide for Seattle, WA

Community Poll

Allegations should not be treated as proven until a fair process establishes the facts.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

The mayor is excellent at the job—and secretly cheating on a spouse. Is that news?

A local official is effective, honest in office, and privately having an affair. A journalist can verify it but finds no misuse of public resources or direct connection to official duties.

Does private dishonesty reveal something citizens are entitled to judge?

Explore this quandary