Meet In CommonNews

Local

Notre Dame focused on B.C., not playoffs

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Times Leader

SOUTH BEND, Ind. — No. 3 Notre Dame refuses to play the numbers game. Sure, it improved its playoff position by beating top-ranked Miami last week. And, yes, the Fighting Irish (8-1, No. 5 CFP) are trying to make sure they don’t lose ground Saturday when they host struggling Boston College. But they say they are not worried about the rankings, even after being left out of the playoff last season. They just want to continue to win. “We just have to keep doing our job, keep playing the games, winning the games, and if we take care of our business each day and each week, then the results should add up, and we should get to where we should be at,” running back Nolan James Jr. said. “We’re not result driven in that aspect. It’s just something where we’ve got to do our job each and every day, and hopefully the rankings take care of themselves.” On paper, this game looks like a mismatch.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Times Leader

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Research announcements should give uncertainty as much attention as promising findings.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Your anonymous review could cost a coworker a promotion. Do you sign your name?

A company requests anonymous feedback about a colleague being considered for promotion. You have serious concerns based on direct experience, but anonymity prevents them from asking questions or understanding the context of your criticism.

Does honest criticism require accepting personal accountability for it?

Explore this quandary