Meet In CommonNews

Local

Nurse’s license is revoked for financial exploitation of home-health patient

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Iowa Capital Dispatch

State regulators have revoked the license of a home-health nurse due to the financial exploitation of an elderly patient with dementia. Earlier this year, the Iowa Board of Nursing charged 51-year-old licensed practical nurse Danielle Renee Wilson, also known as Danielle Rainey, with committing an act that might adversely affect a patient’s welfare; committing an act that causes injury to a patient; misappropriating the property of a patient; misappropriating money from a patient; and engaging in a relationship with a former patient when there is a risk of exploitation or harm to the patient. The board alleges Wilson, who has lived in Altoona and Carlisle, worked for Angels Care Home Health and provided nursing services for an elderly woman named Patricia from December 2023 through May 2024. At the time, Patricia’s diagnoses included diabetes, chronic pain syndrome, obesity, congestive heart failure, arthritis, anxiety, atrial fibrillation and major depressive disorder.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Iowa Capital Dispatch

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Communities should help financially sustain independent local reporting.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A disgraced billionaire's name is on the beloved campus library. Does it come down?

A major donor funded a beloved public building decades ago. New evidence shows they also caused serious harm that was legal and accepted by many peers at the time. Removing the name may jeopardize future donations.

What does an institution owe the truth when its history funded the present?

Explore this quandary