Business
Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.
Source: NYT > Business
Wachtell partner Joon H. Kim, a former acting U.S. attorney, is leading the inquiry into the chip maker’s chief executive.
This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.
Read the original at NYT > BusinessExplore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.
Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US
Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US
Celia's Mexican Restaurant 3740 West El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, USA
Hobee's Restaurant 4222 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, US
WSJ.com: US Business · Business
Beijing is deploying the world’s biggest intelligence-gathering operation to bolster its tech industry. U.S. officials worry Jensen Huang was ensnared.
WSJ.com: Markets · Business
Plus, America’s richest retirement market, and Chris Van Hollen says he will challenge Chuck Schumer to lead Senate Democrats.
NYT > Business · Business
Mr. Huang championed start-ups, with Nvidia holding $48 billion worth of stakes in 229 private companies, including OpenAI and Anthropic, at the end of July.
NYT > Business · Business
Jensen Huang was the driving force at Nvidia, with 60 direct reports and no clear succession plan. Tripp Mickle, one of our technology reporters, examines Mr. Huang’s central role in the company and the artificial intelligence industry.
NPR Topics: Business · Business
NPR's Scott Detrow talks with Dylan Patel of the AI and semiconductor research firm SemiAnalysis about Jensen Huang's departure from Nvidia, and whether it opens up the field for Nvidia's competitors.
WSJ.com: US Business · Business
Was it a brilliant operation by Chinese intelligence or trivial gamesmanship that spun out of control?
Community Poll
Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.
Do you agree or disagree?
Common Quandary
Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.
A local creator films themselves buying groceries for strangers. The videos generate substantial income, but they also inspire donations and allow the creator to help more people.
Do mixed motives diminish a genuinely helpful act?
